Subject: [SG10] Draft: ready for the mid-term mailing?
From: Nelson, Clark (clark.nelson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-21 19:52:22
Here, just in time for the weekend (in my time zone), is a draft fresh out
of the oven.
Basically all of the substantive changes relative to what I sent out after
Wednesday's meeting are related to __has_include, for which you can search.
In particular, since I received no responses to my last message explaining
why I think the __cpp_lib_header_* macros are important, I have left them
in. But I have moved them to the <utility> header (having heard no objection
to that idea).
So there are two ways by which we recommend it be possible to test for
these new headers. That is supposed to be clear from the way the table is
laid out, but I'm afraid that there are too many different subtleties in
what I've tried to imply through the table layout. I'm going to experiment
with making the subtleties clearer by adding footnotes.
Don't forget that the deadline for the mid-term mailing is one week from
today, so we're getting close to the wire.
-- Clark Nelson Vice chair, PL22.16 (ANSI C++ standard committee) Intel Corporation Chair, SG10 (C++ SG for feature-testing) clark.nelson_at_[hidden] Chair, CPLEX (C SG for parallel language extensions)
SG10 list run by firstname.lastname@example.org