Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 08:51:58 +0200
On 05/03/2013 01:08 AM, Stephen Clamage wrote:
> The attachment looked fine in my mail client. :-)
>
> Given that not all compilers yet implement all of C++11, are we
> considering macros for C++11 features? (Sorry if answered elsewhere, I'm
> new to this group.)
I believe that is intended, at least for C++11 features not yet
widely implemented. IIRC, Tom Plum wanted to provide a list.
Jens
> The attachment looked fine in my mail client. :-)
>
> Given that not all compilers yet implement all of C++11, are we
> considering macros for C++11 features? (Sorry if answered elsewhere, I'm
> new to this group.)
I believe that is intended, at least for C++11 features not yet
widely implemented. IIRC, Tom Plum wanted to provide a list.
Jens
Received on 2013-05-03 08:57:36