Subject: Re: [SG10] First draft recommendation for C++14
From: Stephen Clamage (stephen.clamage_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-02 18:08:52
The attachment looked fine in my mail client. :-)
Given that not all compilers yet implement all of C++11, are we
considering macros for C++11 features? (Sorry if answered elsewhere, I'm
new to this group.)
- Steve Clamage
On 05/02/13 15:33, Nelson, Clark wrote:
> I've attached the work I've done so far towards drafting a feature-testing recommendation for C++14. The prose is just copied from my original paper (N3435), as a sort of place-holder for an introduction. The real work went into the table.
> FYI, part of my idea at this point is to include as much useful information in the table as will fit. Hopefully, the table will eventually become a fairly well-known resource; if so, more people will be exposed to the general idea of standard feature-test macros, and to the specific macro names.
> Let's see how well the attachment makes it through our reflector.
> (FYI, I may not see any comments on this until Monday. I'm really not ignoring you. :-)
SG10 list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com