liaison

Tuesday, 30 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] fixed width types Joshua Cranmer
• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] fixed width types Jens Maurer
• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] fixed width types Pynix Wnag

Sunday, 28 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] fixed width types Bjarne Stroustrup
• [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] fixed width types Pynix Wnag

Wednesday, 24 July 2024

• [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] Reminder: SG22 meeeting this Friday Nina Dinka Ranns

Monday, 8 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] [SC22WG14.26035] constexpr atomic in C++ compatibility concerns Joseph Myers

Saturday, 6 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] SG22 telco doodle poll Nina Dinka Ranns
• [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] SG22: P2865 and P2866 Nina Dinka Ranns

Thursday, 4 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] SG22 telco doodle poll Nina Dinka Ranns

Wednesday, 3 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] Request for input on Rebasing C++26 on C23 (and LEWG Telecon on 2024-07-30) Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] [SC22WG14.26035] constexpr atomic in C++ compatibility concerns Richard Smith
• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] [SC22WG14.26035] constexpr atomic in C++ compatibility concerns Richard Smith

Tuesday, 2 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] Request for input on Rebasing C++26 on C23 (and LEWG Telecon on 2024-07-30) Inbal Levi
• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] [SC22WG14.26035] constexpr atomic in C++ compatibility concerns Martin Uecker

Monday, 1 July 2024

• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] [SC22WG14.26035] constexpr atomic in C++ compatibility concerns Billy O'Neal (VC AIR)
• Re: [isocpp-wg14/wg21-liaison] [SC22WG14.26035] constexpr atomic in C++ compatibility concerns Hans Boehm

Last message date: 2024-07-30 15:59:50