Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:56:43 +0000
Am Mittwoch, den 12.08.2020, 09:24 -0700 schrieb JF Bastien:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:17 AM Ville Voutilainen via Liaison <
> liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If WG14 is interested in continuing with this change, then Ville is spot
> on: we want someone to write an EWG paper. I'll treat such a paper with a
> somewhat high priority as a form of "C compatibility bug" and will schedule
> it in a EWG telecon relatively soon. It's a simple change and I hope we
> don't spend much time on it.
>
> Personally I don't particularly care for the change, but I don't want
> divergence in simple things like this either.
Are there specific requirements for EWG papers?
I tried to wite down the wording changes for three alternative
options (still needs careful checking). I could add some intro
and discussion. Anything else?
Best,
Martin
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:17 AM Ville Voutilainen via Liaison <
> liaison_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If WG14 is interested in continuing with this change, then Ville is spot
> on: we want someone to write an EWG paper. I'll treat such a paper with a
> somewhat high priority as a form of "C compatibility bug" and will schedule
> it in a EWG telecon relatively soon. It's a simple change and I hope we
> don't spend much time on it.
>
> Personally I don't particularly care for the change, but I don't want
> divergence in simple things like this either.
Are there specific requirements for EWG papers?
I tried to wite down the wording changes for three alternative
options (still needs careful checking). I could add some intro
and discussion. Anything else?
Best,
Martin
Received on 2020-08-20 02:00:17