Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:02:34 -0700
On Monday, 27 April 2026 14:42:48 Pacific Daylight Time Frederick Virchanza
Gotham via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Consider intercepting a call to a function such as 'printf'.
What could possibly be the use-case for intercepting printf? How do you even
know what the mangling of "printf" is (hint: it's not `printf` everywhere)?
And why should the Standard ever consider allowing intercepting standard
library functions?
Do you really want to pursue this as a Standard change?
I think your idea has value and merit, but as a compiler extension, not as a
Standard feature.
Gotham via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Consider intercepting a call to a function such as 'printf'.
What could possibly be the use-case for intercepting printf? How do you even
know what the mangling of "printf" is (hint: it's not `printf` everywhere)?
And why should the Standard ever consider allowing intercepting standard
library functions?
Do you really want to pursue this as a Standard change?
I think your idea has value and merit, but as a compiler extension, not as a
Standard feature.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Principal Engineer - Intel Data Center - Platform & Sys. Eng.
Received on 2026-04-28 17:02:38
