Noted with thanks

On Mon, 20 Apr 2026, 8:07 pm Jason McKesson via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 10:52 AM Muneem via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Give me sometime to understand your code and respond. I will also write
> some extra possible implementations for the proposed tuple type tomorrow
> and run bench marks against Mine, your's, and Simon's code. I am confident
> mine is faster by a large margin since I can choose any implementation,
> which is to prove that a new type with a new implementation is good because
> the compiler can choose any implementation. Of this ofcourse would be just
> talking until I provide some numbers to back myself up.
> >
> > Billions thanks to everyone for their feedback.
>
> Note that it cannot just be faster at random access. You also have to
> look at how much slower it is at copying, or iterating through
> sequences of them due to the excess bloat in the type.
>
> It's a memory vs. performance tradeoff, so you need to look at the
> downsides too.
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>