My proposal with conceptual implementation that you can run but the
implementation does not have the exact implementation as one with
std::variant<T&...> would have, like I could modify it but it would never
be one to one, so see my implementation as a conceptual implementation
roadmap meant to show how bookkeeping helps rather than showing the exact
semantics of my implementation.

I also fixed some Typos and grammar mistakes (in the code example section)
that were in my updated docx file.

On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 12:47 PM Muneem <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Credits to this video:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDPMpc-ENqY
> like in this video, at the end, he describes std::apply that was useful
> for folding tuples for me. I was lucky to see this a month ago while
> learning random number generators and reading Bjarne's great book. Without
> this video, My code couldn't be completed, like most of it is basic, except
> the part where I used std::apply because that was what took 3 hours to get
> a hint of, which is when this video came into mind somehow. Funny how the
> world is, like I programmed in my dream, literally solving this puzzle.
> This puzzle may look basic to the old timers but for me, this basic puzzle
> took like an honest 4 hours to prototype and 6 hours to fix
> completely(about 10 if you count the 2-4 hours in my dream).
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2026 at 12:25 PM Muneem <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> My code is complete:
>>
>> https://github.com/HjaldrKhilji/Future-potential-ISO-porposals/blob/main/Code_example.cpp
>> https://godbolt.org/z/WWoWrd3q1
>> My updated proposal is also attached and is also on the github link:
>>
>> https://github.com/HjaldrKhilji/Future-potential-ISO-porposals/blob/main/Runtime_Indexed_Tuples_Proposal_Official%20(1).docx
>>
>> Again, I am sorry for taking so much time on such trivial code. I know I
>> should be faster, so hope it dosent reflect badly on the technical merit of
>> my proposal
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 11:22 PM Muneem <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> https://godbolt.org/z/rs34q1Wj9
>>> This is what I got till today, I will debug this tomorrow, but yeah, I
>>> just wanted to show what's done till now before going to sleep.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 8:54 PM Muneem <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am really really sorry that previously my code was not only using
>>>> enable if but also the pattern of making types unique was wrong. I promise
>>>> that I will fix it tomorrow and will test every possible specialization to
>>>> make sure such mistakes don't occur again. Again, really really sorry. I am
>>>> almost done with the proper code but it's just a little bit left that I
>>>> left for tomorrow. I know it's nothing special and that I should be better
>>>> at wiring such basic code but things happen and in my case, it would to not
>>>> think properly so as to use recursion with conditinal_t.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Muneem
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, 19 Apr 2026, 8:28 pm Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals, <
>>>> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, 19 April 2026 01:01:13 Pacific Daylight Time Muneem via Std-
>>>>> Proposals wrote:
>>>>> > This is the example implementation code:
>>>>>
>>>>> Send the link to the working implementation in godbolt or your
>>>>> repository on
>>>>> GitHub/GitLab/equivalent.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
>>>>> Principal Engineer - Intel Data Center - Platform & Sys. Eng.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>>>>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>>>>
>>>>