On Mon, 20 Apr 2026 at 01:18, Sebastian Wittmeier via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I think it is quite well written and researched.
>
>
>
> One could add Tony Tables.
>
> The narrative could be more direct, instead of telling in which order you tested, and decided and added functions. On the other hand it is logical, adds to motivation and easy to read. Probably a question of style.

I think it would be helpful to add more prose or a summary to talk
about the comparison of the benchmark results.

> You have motivation, solution, researched a large codebase, created an implantation, done benchmark comparisons and added wording.

Yeah. I personally don't care about priority_queues all that much, but
this paper seems splendidly ready for an initial review round in LEWG.