I am really sorry you felt that way but the factual data is mathematical
proof, and I will provide benchmarking data soon that uses
reference_wrapper based implementation techniques.

On Sat, Apr 18, 2026 at 8:39 PM Giuseppe D'Angelo via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I'll disengage from this thread because I feel that it's just becoming a
> massive waste of time, and/or OP is trolling the list, by not providing
> any factual data.
>
> Just one note:
>
> On 18/04/2026 17:28, Simon Schröder via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > Make it a std::vector<const std::variant> instead
>
> This cannot exist; it violates the allocator requirements (and most of
> the container requirements). I'm working on a proposal (P4102) that
> brings us one step closer to vector<const T>, though. It should be in
> the next mailing.
>
> Thank you,
> --
> Giuseppe D'Angelo
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>