On 18/04/2026 17:01, Muneem via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Again, I get your point, I really do, but the thing is that even if
> tuples were slower:
> 1.you would call if microbenchmarks as it always happens on the list

This is a complete and utter straw man. You're making performance
claims, so you should bring performance data.


> 2. It dosent matter because the goal is a new type for a new notions
> that is different that product types(tuples). Basically it tries to
> extend the notion/idea of product types. Building anything on the top of
> product types to extend the notion is just dragging on baggage; It's a
> new type with new ABIs.

*Which* notions? Extend *how*? Do you have a synopsis of the new type?
Examples of usage?



> 3. I can't do benchmarks since variants of references dosent exist, so
> any benchmark would be flawed since it would not include one the main
> aspects of what makes my proposal efficient.

This is another strawman. Surely you can create a dummy/placeholder
class to use as the return type.


--
Giuseppe D'Angelo