Mr.Emanual taking about something completely different, so please ignore my
comments.
 sorry for Mr.Emanuel.

On Sat, 4 Apr 2026, 4:44 am Muneem, <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Sorry for mistakenly mixing my email with your discussion, but std::tuples
> still require switch case statements for runtime indexing and masking it on
> a standard library level still relies on intermediate code generation for
> optimizations. Again really sorry for mixing it up.
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Apr 2026, 4:25 am Bjorn Reese via Std-Proposals, <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On 4/3/26 20:49, Emanuel Spiridon via Std-Proposals wrote:
>> > I submitted the paper regarding this proposal, which can be read here:
>> > https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P4174R0.pdf
>>
>> Notice that such type algorithms have previously been proposed in
>>
>> https://wg21.link/P0949
>>
>> That proposal does not introduce its own type-list, but rather works
>> on any type-list, including types like std::tuple or std::variant.
>>
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>