Try adding actual code showing the problem and how it looks like with the
different options you claim de be not sufficient and how the code would
look like with your solutions.

There are many wrong assumptions on how things work today. I honestly
cannot understand what you are actually proposing.

Em qua., 1 de abr. de 2026, 20:37, Muneem via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> escreveu:

> This is the updated proposal
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2026 at 1:45 AM Muneem <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, I will draft a format proposal that outline all the problems (a whole
>> class of problems), cite all the possible solutions, and then cite bjarne
>> Stroustrup quotes from his old 2013 book to back my philosophy up. Give me
>> some time and thank you for your feedback ❤️❤️
>>
>> Regards, Muneem
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Apr 2026, 1:15 am Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals, <
>> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, 1 April 2026 10:52:08 Pacific Daylight Time Muneem via Std-
>>> Proposals wrote:
>>> > Okay, I won't make the JIT part in my proposal, but just so I know,
>>> you do
>>> > support me if I dont? Like you will vouch for me and help me in my
>>> actual
>>> > formal proposal?
>>>
>>> I haven't understood the problem yet. You need to start the proposal
>>> with the
>>> problems (plural) that need solving, preferably with multiple possible
>>> alternatives and showing why you think your solution is best.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
>>> Principal Engineer - Intel Data Center - Platform & Sys. Eng.
>>> --
>>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>>
>> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>