The mistake was a excitement mistake because I thought that the reason my
initial response wasent in the archives was because I didn't sent it to std
proposal's, but I didn't realize that some of you were doing it on purpose.
Million sorry for that.

On Wed, 1 Apr 2026, 10:54 pm Muneem, <itfllow123_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I am highly sorry if I made the private email of any of you gentlemen
> public while responding, like emails have a habit of getting mixed up,and
> to be honestly; I might have OCD, which makes me want to make sure that I
> defend myself for any email that I feel is public, hence I sent all the
> responses to std proposal's.
>
> Regards, Muneem ❤️
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2026, 8:18 pm Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals, <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, 31 March 2026 23:13:14 Pacific Daylight Time Muneem via Std-
>> Proposals wrote:
>> > I will not talk about JIT, but I will cite the possibility that JIT's
>> can
>> > be used. It is just to keep my name in history as one of the men who
>> > thought JIT is the future.
>> > Infact I will call JIT the most radical but possible solution.
>>
>> No, my advice is to not talk about it at all. That will draw the
>> attention
>> away from the problem you have and the solution you're proposing. There's
>> no
>> value in discussing something that cannot be applied.
>> --
>> Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
>> Principal Engineer - Intel Data Center - Platform & Sys. Eng.
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>