Also worth mentioning that the voice sounds like an ElevenLabs TTS voice,
the creator has no C++ repos (https://github.com/LazoVelko?tab=repositories),
has at least one repo related to AI, and most of the images in the video
are obviously AI-generated.

I'm actually impressed at how far AI slop has come, but when you know what
to look for, it's quite obvious that the whole video is nonsensical slop.

On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 at 14:17, Jan Schultke <janschultke_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> I'm now convinced that not just the images in the video, but the script
> and likely the voiceover are entirely AI-generated.
>
> One of the first points in the video is that Java's (int) x is much
> cleaner than the static_cast<int> that you allegedly "have to use" in
> C++. Obviously, the (int) x syntax is valid in C++ too, so this argument
> makes zero sense.
>
> How can someone be knowledgeable enough to produce one hour worth of C++
> critique, with some reasonable points, but have no idea that C-style casts
> exist? This is totally implausible unless the script is AI-generated.
> Making fun of C++'s (T), static_cast, reinterpret_cast, const_cast,
> dynamic_cast, std::static_pointer_cast, ... multitude of casting would
> have made a lot of sense for the chapter on casting. If the author had any
> human knowledge on the topic of C++, surely that would have been mentioned.
>
> The most likely explanation is that the author looked at (int) in Java,
> asked ChatGPT what the C++ counterpart is, got back static_cast, thought
> "this looks ugly", and generated a script from that.
>
>
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2025 at 00:09, organicoman via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I saw this video, and i felt it would be interesting to hear other's
>> opinions.
>>
>> https://youtu.be/7fGB-hjc2Gc?si=EqMPxxxvS40lL4Yv
>>
>> Regards
>> Og
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Galaxy
>>
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>