[std-proposals] Permit Elision or Trivial Elision for Coroutine Parameter Moves?
[std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
- Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
[std-proposals] std::bitset split and concat
[std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
[std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
[std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship
[std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
[std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
- Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
[std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
[std-proposals] constexpr std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t and std::chrono::system_clock::from_time_t
[std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late