Saturday, 30 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] adding declaration requirement to 'requires'-expression requirement
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence
- [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence
- [std-proposals] adding declaration requirement to 'requires'-expression requirement
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
- [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning)
Friday, 29 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++
- [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
Thursday, 28 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
Wednesday, 27 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- [std-proposals] #include <debug>
- Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship
Tuesday, 26 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter
- Re: [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter
- Re: [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter
- [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter
- Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue
- Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue
- Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue
- Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue
Monday, 25 November 2024
- [std-proposals] Improving break & continue
- Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution
Sunday, 24 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Improving std::initializer_list for Move Semantics
- [std-proposals] Improving std::initializer_list for Move Semantics
Friday, 22 November 2024
Thursday, 21 November 2024
Wednesday, 20 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Permit Elision or Trivial Elision for Coroutine Parameter Moves?
- [std-proposals] Permit Elision or Trivial Elision for Coroutine Parameter Moves?
Tuesday, 19 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
- Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
Monday, 18 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
- Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
- [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function
Sunday, 17 November 2024
Saturday, 16 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
- [std-proposals] std::bitset split and concat
- Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
- Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
- Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
Friday, 15 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
Thursday, 14 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship
Wednesday, 13 November 2024
Tuesday, 12 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
- [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation
Monday, 11 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship
- Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship
- [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship
Sunday, 10 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
- [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors
Friday, 8 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
Thursday, 7 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
- [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of
Wednesday, 6 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- [std-proposals] constexpr std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t and std::chrono::system_clock::from_time_t
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
- [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines
Saturday, 2 November 2024
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late
- Re: [std-proposals] A drift for c++ decorators;
- Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution
- Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late
- Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late