std-proposals

Friday, 22 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] std::shared_ptr<> improvement / 2 Billy

Thursday, 21 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Wednesday, 20 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Permit Elision or Trivial Elision for Coroutine Parameter Moves? Jens Maurer
• [std-proposals] Permit Elision or Trivial Elision for Coroutine Parameter Moves? Yuxuan Chen

Tuesday, 19 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Robin Savonen Söderholm

Monday, 18 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Arthur O'Dwyer
• [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Robin Savonen Söderholm

Sunday, 17 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution zys

Saturday, 16 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo
• [std-proposals] std::bitset split and concat Nikolaj Fogh
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts zxuiji

Friday, 15 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Henry Miller
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Henry Miller
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Sebastian Wittmeier
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Henry Miller
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo

Thursday, 14 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Jason McKesson
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Tiago Freire
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Bo Persson
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Lénárd Szolnoki
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Egor
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Peter Bindels
• [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati
• Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Halalaluyafail3

Wednesday, 13 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati

Tuesday, 12 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Tiago Freire
• [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati

Monday, 11 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Francesco Pretto
• Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Sebastian Wittmeier
• [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Francesco Pretto

Sunday, 10 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Fabio Fracassi
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Bjorn Reese
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors André Offringa
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors André Offringa
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Bo Persson
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Jonathan Wakely
• [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors André Offringa

Friday, 8 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira

Thursday, 7 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Lauri Vasama
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jan Schultke
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Breno Guimarães
• [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Wednesday, 6 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Halalaluyafail3
• [std-proposals] constexpr std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t and std::chrono::system_clock::from_time_t Jonas Christen
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Jonathan Wakely
• [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Halalaluyafail3

Saturday, 2 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] A drift for c++ decorators; Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution zys
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Brian Bi

Last message date: 2024-11-22 17:49:58