std-proposals

Saturday, 30 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) James
• Re: [std-proposals] adding declaration requirement to 'requires'-expression requirement Brian Bi
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Julien Villemure-Fréchette
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Sebastian Wittmeier
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) James
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) James
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) James
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence Ville Voutilainen
• [std-proposals] Fwd: destructurable std::integer_sequence Desmond Gold
• [std-proposals] adding declaration requirement to 'requires'-expression requirement Desmond Gold
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Artur z Redy
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) Sebastian Wittmeier
• [std-proposals] std::typeless_memory (type punning) James

Friday, 29 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Sebastian Wittmeier
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++ Artur z Redy
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++ Sebastian Wittmeier
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++ Artur z Redy
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++ Sebastian Wittmeier
• [std-proposals] Proposal for policy scopes and attribute aliases in C++ Artur z Redy
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Thiago Macieira

Thursday, 28 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Sebastian Wittmeier
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Thiago Macieira

Wednesday, 27 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] #include <debug> Andre Kostur
• [std-proposals] #include <debug> Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Francesco Pretto

Tuesday, 26 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter Gašper Ažman
• Re: [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter Robin Savonen Söderholm
• [std-proposals] Designated-This Parameter Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue Halalaluyafail3
• Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue Halalaluyafail3
• Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Improving break & continue Oliver Hunt

Monday, 25 November 2024

• [std-proposals] Improving break & continue Filip
• Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution zys

Sunday, 24 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Improving std::initializer_list for Move Semantics Arthur O'Dwyer
• [std-proposals] Improving std::initializer_list for Move Semantics James

Friday, 22 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] std::shared_ptr<> improvement / 2 Billy

Thursday, 21 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Wednesday, 20 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Permit Elision or Trivial Elision for Coroutine Parameter Moves? Jens Maurer
• [std-proposals] Permit Elision or Trivial Elision for Coroutine Parameter Moves? Yuxuan Chen

Tuesday, 19 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Robin Savonen Söderholm

Monday, 18 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Marcin Jaczewski
• Re: [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Arthur O'Dwyer
• [std-proposals] Query "SOO" from std::function and/or std::inplace_function Robin Savonen Söderholm

Sunday, 17 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution zys

Saturday, 16 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo
• [std-proposals] std::bitset split and concat Nikolaj Fogh
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts zxuiji

Friday, 15 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Henry Miller
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Henry Miller
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Sebastian Wittmeier
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Henry Miller
• Re: [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo

Thursday, 14 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Jason McKesson
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Tiago Freire
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Bo Persson
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Lénárd Szolnoki
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Egor
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Peter Bindels
• [std-proposals] Give Microsoft N years to change their ABI Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati
• Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Halalaluyafail3

Wednesday, 13 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Arthur O'Dwyer
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati

Tuesday, 12 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Tiago Freire
• [std-proposals] RFC: Ignorable deprecation Alberto Barbati

Monday, 11 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Francesco Pretto
• Re: [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Sebastian Wittmeier
• [std-proposals] Method/member granular friendship Francesco Pretto

Sunday, 10 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Fabio Fracassi
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Bjorn Reese
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors André Offringa
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors André Offringa
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Bo Persson
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors Jonathan Wakely
• [std-proposals] Proposal for skipping initialization in vector and complex constructors André Offringa

Friday, 8 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• [std-proposals] default, delete, and auto for templates and other contexts mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira

Thursday, 7 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Thiago Macieira
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jeremy Rifkin
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Robin Savonen Söderholm
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Lauri Vasama
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Jan Schultke
• Re: [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Breno Guimarães
• [std-proposals] Ensure ABI compatibility at runtime -- std::layout_of Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Wednesday, 6 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Halalaluyafail3
• [std-proposals] constexpr std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t and std::chrono::system_clock::from_time_t Jonas Christen
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Jonathan Wakely
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Jonathan Wakely
• [std-proposals] Requirements on integer types with <random> don't make sense with predefined engines Halalaluyafail3

Saturday, 2 November 2024

• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] A drift for c++ decorators; Frederick Virchanza Gotham
• Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution Jens Maurer
• Re: [std-proposals] An efficient event-based coroutine solution zys
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late mauro russo
• Re: [std-proposals] clarify standard about template specialization not defined too late Brian Bi

Last message date: 2024-11-30 23:42:03