Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 16:21:38 +0300
On Mon, 23 Sept 2024 at 15:21, Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Here’s the summary of the discussion for those who missed it.
> The reason why people in the camp of “no to #pragma once”, has little to do with the technical details
So, at this point this "summary of the discussion" becomes a distorted
opinion piece..
> They want to be able to bully 3rd party developers
..and this puts icing on that cake.
It has everything to do with technical details. There's no bullying of
any kind. At least not in that direction. The same cannot
necessarily be said about the other direction and its message
"you must accept this proposal even though you have practical uses
broken by it, just fix those uses, it's easy".
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Here’s the summary of the discussion for those who missed it.
> The reason why people in the camp of “no to #pragma once”, has little to do with the technical details
So, at this point this "summary of the discussion" becomes a distorted
opinion piece..
> They want to be able to bully 3rd party developers
..and this puts icing on that cake.
It has everything to do with technical details. There's no bullying of
any kind. At least not in that direction. The same cannot
necessarily be said about the other direction and its message
"you must accept this proposal even though you have practical uses
broken by it, just fix those uses, it's easy".
Received on 2024-09-23 13:21:51