Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:46:02 +0300
On Mon, 2 Sept 2024 at 15:38, Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> > That is out of order. I don't have a secret setup, it's not my setup.
> > If other people aren't willing to show you exactly what they're doing, they have the liberty to do so.
>
> Precisely. You are talking, but you have no idea what you are talking about. It's hearsay, you don't actually know.
> You have citing problems that you have never actually seen. That's the problem!
There's no problem in it. I have credible reports from serious users
and compiler vendors, who independently
and far removed by both time and discussion venue have reported
exactly the same problem. That's no longer hearsay,
that's correlation of independent reports given in good faith, and
taken in such good faith.
> It’s completely unreasonable to shoot down a proposal citing a problem that can not be demonstrated. How do I know its even real?
What reason do you have to think that the problem isn't real?
>
>
> > That is out of order. I don't have a secret setup, it's not my setup.
> > If other people aren't willing to show you exactly what they're doing, they have the liberty to do so.
>
> Precisely. You are talking, but you have no idea what you are talking about. It's hearsay, you don't actually know.
> You have citing problems that you have never actually seen. That's the problem!
There's no problem in it. I have credible reports from serious users
and compiler vendors, who independently
and far removed by both time and discussion venue have reported
exactly the same problem. That's no longer hearsay,
that's correlation of independent reports given in good faith, and
taken in such good faith.
> It’s completely unreasonable to shoot down a proposal citing a problem that can not be demonstrated. How do I know its even real?
What reason do you have to think that the problem isn't real?
Received on 2024-09-02 12:46:16