niedz., 30 cze 2024 o 19:38 Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> napisał(a):
>
> Ok so there's no issue and nothing to discuss. 😊
>

It looks like that. As this is still a bleeding edge it is hard to
verify how it will work myself.

Probably the best mental model of how modules work is "object files"
as Ville said,
instead of classic `#include` files. This mean would be better to have
few big modules
than many small form usage perspective as the overall final binary
should be similar.
(this would not even be problem with recompiation as we have module partitions)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2024 19:36
> To: std-proposals_at_[hidden]
> Cc: Tiago Freire <tmiguelf_at_[hidden]>; Bo Persson <bo_at_[hidden]>
> Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Freestanding std modules
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 20:35, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 30 Jun 2024 at 20:29, Tiago Freire via Std-Proposals
> > <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Not sure if looking at MSVC is the right thing, seems like a it has been direct at the gcc mailing list, so it might be an issue with that compiler.
> >
> > There is no issue with any compiler here, nor with the design of C++
> > modules. The sender of the email that started this whole discussion is
> > unhinged.
>
> To clarify, I mean the email sent to the gcc list. :)

@Ville uff... I was start worrying that I was this person :D

> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals