Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2024 22:28:59 +0900
That's correct. We are hoping to catch c++26.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, 22:15 Jonathan Wakely via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 12:40, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Looking at P2098r1:
>>
>> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p2098r1.pdf
>>
>> The given implementation works fine for specialisations of 'vector', but
>> not for specialisations of 'array', as follows:
>>
>> #include <cstddef>
>> #include <array>
>> #include <type_traits>
>> #include <vector>
>>
>> namespace std {
>> template< class T , template<class...> class Primary >
>> struct is_specialization_of : false_type {};
>> template< template<class...> class Primary , class... Args >
>> struct is_specialization_of< Primary<Args...>, Primary> : true_type {};
>> }
>>
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> using std::is_specialization_of;
>> static_assert( is_specialization_of< std::vector<int>, std::vector
>> >::value );
>> static_assert( is_specialization_of< std::array<int, 5>, std::array
>> >::value );
>> }
>>
>> Compiler output:
>>
>> a.cpp: In function 'int main()':
>> a.cpp:22:73: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template
>> parameter list for 'template<class T, template<class ...> class Primary>
>> struct std::is_specialization_of'
>> a.cpp:22:73: note: expected a template of type 'template<class ...> class
>> Primary', got 'template<class _Tp, long unsigned int _Nm> struct std::array'
>>
>> If 'is_specialization_of' is to be written into the Standard, shall it be
>> worded that it requires compiler support to let it work with every template
>> class (and not just the ones whose parameters are exclusively all types)?
>> Or will the use of this feature be restricted to template classes whose
>> parameters are all types?
>>
>> I'm talking something like:
>>
>> namespace std {
>> template< class T , /* COMPILER_SUPPORT */ Primary >
>> struct is_specialization_of : false_type {};
>> template< /* COMPILER_SUPPORT */ Primary , class... Args >
>> struct is_specialization_of< Primary<Args...>, Primary> : true_type {};
>> }
>>
>
>
> I think
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p2989r1.pdf is
> the latesty work in this space.
>
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024, 22:15 Jonathan Wakely via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 12:40, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Looking at P2098r1:
>>
>> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p2098r1.pdf
>>
>> The given implementation works fine for specialisations of 'vector', but
>> not for specialisations of 'array', as follows:
>>
>> #include <cstddef>
>> #include <array>
>> #include <type_traits>
>> #include <vector>
>>
>> namespace std {
>> template< class T , template<class...> class Primary >
>> struct is_specialization_of : false_type {};
>> template< template<class...> class Primary , class... Args >
>> struct is_specialization_of< Primary<Args...>, Primary> : true_type {};
>> }
>>
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> using std::is_specialization_of;
>> static_assert( is_specialization_of< std::vector<int>, std::vector
>> >::value );
>> static_assert( is_specialization_of< std::array<int, 5>, std::array
>> >::value );
>> }
>>
>> Compiler output:
>>
>> a.cpp: In function 'int main()':
>> a.cpp:22:73: error: type/value mismatch at argument 2 in template
>> parameter list for 'template<class T, template<class ...> class Primary>
>> struct std::is_specialization_of'
>> a.cpp:22:73: note: expected a template of type 'template<class ...> class
>> Primary', got 'template<class _Tp, long unsigned int _Nm> struct std::array'
>>
>> If 'is_specialization_of' is to be written into the Standard, shall it be
>> worded that it requires compiler support to let it work with every template
>> class (and not just the ones whose parameters are exclusively all types)?
>> Or will the use of this feature be restricted to template classes whose
>> parameters are all types?
>>
>> I'm talking something like:
>>
>> namespace std {
>> template< class T , /* COMPILER_SUPPORT */ Primary >
>> struct is_specialization_of : false_type {};
>> template< /* COMPILER_SUPPORT */ Primary , class... Args >
>> struct is_specialization_of< Primary<Args...>, Primary> : true_type {};
>> }
>>
>
>
> I think
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p2989r1.pdf is
> the latesty work in this space.
>
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
Received on 2024-03-26 13:29:11