Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:56:47 -0800
On Sunday, 11 February 2024 10:28:41 PST Jan Schultke via Std-Proposals wrote:
> Other than that, the vendor can just do what they please. It might not
> be a good idea to use _BitInt(128) as a 128-bit type in the long run
> though, since it needs to have the same conversion, promotion, and
> overload resolution rules as standard integer types.
In other words, it would NOT be a good idea to use _BitInt because those don't
have the same conversion and promotion rules as standard integer types.
> Other than that, the vendor can just do what they please. It might not
> be a good idea to use _BitInt(128) as a 128-bit type in the long run
> though, since it needs to have the same conversion, promotion, and
> overload resolution rules as standard integer types.
In other words, it would NOT be a good idea to use _BitInt because those don't
have the same conversion and promotion rules as standard integer types.
-- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering
Received on 2024-02-11 20:56:48