On Sat, 16 Dec 2023 at 05:55, Ryan Nicholl <rnicholl_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> With regard to this note:
>
> There is a single element of the aggregate, of an unspecified empty
> aggregate type.
>
> I believe that resolution is unsatisfactory as it would be a forced abi
> break for libc++.
>
> What is the chance a fix can be retroactively applied to C++17? I am not
> sure what is the process for a defect report and how it differs from
> regular proposals.
>

Typically, implementers treat all library issues as bug fixes for prior
standards, where it's appropriate to a given standard.