On Saturday, 25 November 2023 12:28:37 PST Smith, Jim via Std-Proposals wrote:
> > You're still describing devirtualisation. This already exists.
>
> I'm sorry, what I mentioned was for a C++ standard based implementation that
> would be available across the board.
> > You need to explain why devirtualisation isn't enough for your needs and
> > why this change needs to be in the standard.
>
> If it's not part of the standard there's no certainty it'll be available
> when building with another compiler?

You haven't explained why you need to do this.

If you want to make a non-virtual call, you can already:

        interface* i = Factory::Create();
        i->Factory::someVirtualFunc();

This is not a virtual call.

You've only vaguely described a possible solution. We're asking you to explain
the problem that you think this solution solves.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
   Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering