Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 13:56:09 +0200
Because I only care about the exception thrown at `func()` and don't want
to have exception handling for the rest of the code.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:54 PM Fabio Alemagna <falemagn_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> Il mer 22 nov 2023, 12:50 sasho648 via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> ha scritto:
>
>> Ok use-case I was thinking is actually:
>>
>> int f() {
>>
>> try (auto &ref = func()) {
>> } catch(...) {
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> // use ref here
>> }
>>
>
> Why would you want to use ref after the whole try-catch block?
>
> If func() does't throw, you can use ref right after its call, within the
> try block itself.
>
>>
to have exception handling for the rest of the code.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:54 PM Fabio Alemagna <falemagn_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> Il mer 22 nov 2023, 12:50 sasho648 via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> ha scritto:
>
>> Ok use-case I was thinking is actually:
>>
>> int f() {
>>
>> try (auto &ref = func()) {
>> } catch(...) {
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> // use ref here
>> }
>>
>
> Why would you want to use ref after the whole try-catch block?
>
> If func() does't throw, you can use ref right after its call, within the
> try block itself.
>
>>
Received on 2023-11-22 11:56:21