Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 00:38:47 +0100
On 05/11/2023 21:38, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals wrote:
> So I was thinking . . . what if we could easily express that we want to
> continue on to the next iteration of the loop, but that we don't want to
> execute the post-iterative step. Maybe we could write "!continue" for
> this, something like:
In Perl this is called `redo`, which is a much much much better name
than `!continue`.
My 2 c,
> So I was thinking . . . what if we could easily express that we want to
> continue on to the next iteration of the loop, but that we don't want to
> execute the post-iterative step. Maybe we could write "!continue" for
> this, something like:
In Perl this is called `redo`, which is a much much much better name
than `!continue`.
My 2 c,
-- Giuseppe D'Angelo
Received on 2023-11-05 23:38:51