On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:59, Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Furthermore, if `checked_process_it` really intends to deal with optionals, (smart) pointers, etc., then it is probably missing some code to unwrap the optional/pointer after checking it for engagement/non-nullness.

No, it probably isn't, because the process_it overloads can do that.