Hello,

Il 29/09/23 15:31, Jason McKesson via Std-Proposals ha scritto:
> If you're examining unspecified, implementation specific behavior, it
> is no longer a matter of UB. The standard defines what is and is not
> UB; an implementation cannot. Well, an implementation can explicitly
> define something that is said to be "implementation-defined" as UB,
> but only through documentation.
>
> Or put simply, generated code doesn't have UB.

Makes sense. I've reworked the paragraph.

Thank you for the review.

-- 
Giuseppe D'Angelo