On 24/05/2023 17:23, Alejandro Colomar via Std-Proposals wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/23 15:48, David Brown via Std-Proposals wrote:
>> I think a better idea here would be to propose allowing "break" inside
>> an "if" statement. That would be simpler, clearer, and have more
>> potential applications - instead of your "once" you'd write "if (true)",
>> and instead of "once (condition)" you'd write "if (condition)".
>
> That would be incompatible with things like:
>
> for (;;) {
> if (x)
> break;
> }

Yes, as has been pointed out to me, I didn't think things through very well.