C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] Alteration of elements in a set (non-const iterator)

From: Sebastian Wittmeier <wittmeier_at_[hidden]>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 22:07:07 +0200
Too late. C++23 got really const:  https://www.kdab.com/cpp23-will-be-really-awesome/   -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von:Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> Gesendet:Mo 22.05.2023 20:55 Betreff:Re: [std-proposals] Alteration of elements in a set (non-const iterator) An:std-proposals_at_[hidden]; Edward Catmur <ecatmur_at_[hidden]>; CC:Thiago Macieira <thiago_at_[hidden]>; On Monday, 22 May 2023 11:18:45 PDT Edward Catmur wrote: > I've been meaning to ask for a [[really_const]] attribute for a while. > > It shouldn't be necessary (per the standard, implementations might want to > add it anyway). That's for the first case I pasted, where the sub-object isn't a const object, but we called a const member function. It is allowed to const_cast and modify the object, because the object isn't const. I want an attribute to say "no, really, I promise not to const_cast". -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org   Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering -- Std-Proposals mailing list Std-Proposals_at_[hidden] https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

Received on 2023-05-22 20:07:08