Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 21:51:51 +0100
Il 29/01/23 21:49, Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals ha scritto:
> When a proposal says "This is a pure library extension.", I take that
> to mean that it requires no compiler magic,
> not that it's an extension confined purely in the library sections of
> the standard. The latter meaning is useless,
> I can see that from the wording at a glance, but I think it would be
> rather more helpful to say that the proposal
> is about adding a trait that needs compiler help.
Apologies for that, I'll clarify. What I meant was that I am not
proposing to touch the language in any way, nor to change any other
existing parts of the library.
Thank you,
> When a proposal says "This is a pure library extension.", I take that
> to mean that it requires no compiler magic,
> not that it's an extension confined purely in the library sections of
> the standard. The latter meaning is useless,
> I can see that from the wording at a glance, but I think it would be
> rather more helpful to say that the proposal
> is about adding a trait that needs compiler help.
Apologies for that, I'll clarify. What I meant was that I am not
proposing to touch the language in any way, nor to change any other
existing parts of the library.
Thank you,
-- Giuseppe D'Angelo
Received on 2023-01-29 20:51:54