Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 08:54:45 +0900
>
> Why is that better or worse than an additional constructor overload that
> takes a tag type, e.g. std::vector v(std::reserve, 42)
> ?
>
I have no idea, though the non-member function may possibly be more
compatible with autocomplete of editors than the constructor??
> Why is that better or worse than an additional constructor overload that
> takes a tag type, e.g. std::vector v(std::reserve, 42)
> ?
>
I have no idea, though the non-member function may possibly be more
compatible with autocomplete of editors than the constructor??
Received on 2022-03-20 23:54:59