https://godbolt.org/z/T4qc5o8Mb

that turns out to be many times slower vs. std::allocator<> ...

I must be doing something wrong?

On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 at 09:40, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> And here's a more generic one that is 10x faster for straight allocations.
>
> Anyway my point being that apparently the rebind oddity has been removed
> from the C++20 standards but not from my system headers... So perhaps
> adding a similar ultra fast allocator such as this one into the stdlib
> would be constructive.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> *Phil Bouchard*
> Founder & CTO
> C.: (819) 328-4743
>
> [image: Fornux Logo] <http://www.fornux.com>
>
>
> On 7/23/21 10:23 PM, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> Given the default memory allocator is known to be slow, it came to my
> attention that if we collect more information at compile-time regarding not
> only the type being allocated but the container type and the usage
> frequency then we can have much higher performance.
>
> In the attached example, if we use a queue then we can speed up the
> overall allocation time by 7x!
>
>
> Regards,
> --
>
> *Phil Bouchard*
> Founder & CTO
> C.: (819) 328-4743
>
> [image: Fornux Logo] <http://www.fornux.com>
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>