Yeah I was referring to the latter and all possible parallelization
solutions. Ok thanks for the update, that's great to know!

-- 
*Phil Bouchard*
Founder & CTO
C.: (819) 328-4743
Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
On 5/16/21 7:15 PM, Lee Howes wrote:
> What do you mean by that? Would you want a pragma model standardised, 
> or a library? Assuming the latter, we already have the parallel 
> algorithms. We are working to standardise executors, both to better 
> support coroutines and networking but also to improve the control over 
> the parallel algorithms. I imagine that with time that would be 
> capable of covering the use cases OpenMP currently has, while doing so 
> without language extensions, although I don't think we'd consider it 
> an explicit goal to do so.
>
> Lee
>
> On Sun, 16 May 2021 at 14:49, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals 
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden] 
> <mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>     - I can see coroutines are already implemented into the standards;
>
>     - Networking will be also but I guess other protocols such as the
>     CAN protocol is lacking:
>
>     https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/experimental/networking
>     <https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/experimental/networking>
>
>     - We are looking forward to standardize deterministic memory
>     management at the ISO level;
>
>
>     My question is: are there any plans to standardize libraries such
>     as OpenMP?
>
>
>     Sincerely,
>
>     -- 
>
>     *Phil Bouchard*
>     Founder & CTO
>     C.: (819) 328-4743
>
>     Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
>     -- 
>     Std-Proposals mailing list
>     Std-Proposals_at_[hidden] <mailto:Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]>
>     https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>     <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals>
>