C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Constexpr std::type_info::hash_code()
From: Omry Noam (omrynoam_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-12-05 09:13:49

The Reflection TS (See N4856) should address this, as far as I understand.

On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 4:52 PM Arthur O'Dwyer via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 9:05 AM darkdragon via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> It would be awesome if a constexpr version of hash_code() and
>> preferably name() would be included in the standard. Is there anything
>> more constexpr than type_info?
> Sadly, yes; `type_info` is intimately tied up with RTTI, and many
> implementations implement type_info::operator== as a string-comparison of
> the names of the types, so that it'll keep working even in the presence of
> dynamically linked libraries (DLLs).
> So your goal might not be literally *impossible*, but it won't be
> trivial, either.
> -Arthur
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals

STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups