C++ Logo


Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Conditional final class-virt-specifier
From: Ville Voutilainen (ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-07-14 04:01:47

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 11:57, Paweł Benetkiewicz via Std-Proposals
<std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > So the basic question "why is this worth having?" is not answered by the proposal.
> The Proposal is worth having, because it does "heavily increase compatibility correctness by inheritance constraints" by providing an ability to encapsulate interfaces. [Note: See Examples section of proposal. — end note]

I can already do what this proposal proposes. There are existing ways
in C++ to reach the same goal, so
the proposal should explain why those ways are inadequate, and why an
extension is necessary.

STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups