C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Feedback on implementing proposed std::error type
From: Gašper Ažman (gasper.azman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-05-15 08:10:25


Submitted.

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:47 AM Charles Salvia <charles.a.salvia_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> Great - thanks so much. I made a few last minute editing/formatting
> changes about 10 minutes ago. Other than that, should be ready to go out.
>
> Again, thanks for all the help.
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 3:02 AM Gašper Ažman <gasper.azman_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>
>> Looks good!
>>
>> I'll send it in. After the mailing comes out, I'll see what we have to do
>> to request an account for you on isocpp that can submit papers.
>>
>> G
>>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2020, 01:20 Charles Salvia <charles.a.salvia_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks again for your help. Here's the re-formatted version:
>>>
>>> http://charles-salvia.github.io/D2170R0.html
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 4:21 AM Gašper Ažman <gasper.azman_at_[hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> D2170R0 is yours :)
>>>>
>>>> The next mailing is May 15th at 2pm UTC, so make sure you hit that.
>>>> Sorry for the rush.
>>>>
>>>> Gašper
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:09 AM Gašper Ažman <gasper.azman_at_[hidden]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Look at mpark/wg21 on GitHub.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not the only way to format documents, but it helps. A paper has a
>>>>> particular structure you should follow, but since yours is not a proposal,
>>>>> you can skip the proposed wording.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once your paper is "in shape" I'll upload it to the tracker. I'll get
>>>>> you a paper number later today.
>>>>>
>>>>> G
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020, 15:35 Charles Salvia <charles.a.salvia_at_[hidden]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, thank you, that would be great. What is the process for
>>>>>> publishing in a mailing?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:41 AM Gašper Ažman <gasper.azman_at_[hidden]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Do you need help publishing this in a mailing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2020, 06:00 Charles Salvia via Std-Proposals <
>>>>>>> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've implemented std::error, meeting the requirements laid out in [
>>>>>>>> P1028
>>>>>>>> <http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2020/p1028r3.pdf>],
>>>>>>>> and based on this experience, have written up a paper outlining various
>>>>>>>> design decisions and concerns that came up during the implementation,
>>>>>>>> particularly with regard to how std::error might map to existing error
>>>>>>>> mechanisms (dynamic exceptions, std::error_code).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is not a formal proposal right now. It is intended simply to
>>>>>>>> further discussion around the design, requirements and implementation
>>>>>>>> details of some future std::error specification.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://charles-salvia.github.io/std_error_feedback.html
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>>>>>>>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>>>>>>>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>



STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups