Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Specific Override Specifier
From: Ryan Nicholl (rnicholl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-18 12:16:06
A non-virtual function can override a virtual function, and vise versa. So virtual can't be deduced.
-------- Original Message --------
On Mar 18, 2020, 10:37, MichaÅ Policht via Std-Proposals wrote:
>> I'd suggest a different syntax:
>> class A : public B, public C
>> virtual int B::lock() override;
>> virtual int C::lock() override;
>> but I've only needed this rarely; I suspect it probably isn't worth the
> With such syntax you could get rid of `override`, since it can be
> deduced (maybe even `virtual`, but some language rules might prevent this).
> Std-Proposals mailing list
STD-PROPOSALS list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com
Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups