STD-PROPOSALS

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Associated Methods (Draft 2)
From: Михаил Найденов (mihailnajdenov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-01-03 10:43:53

• Next message: Ville Voutilainen: "Re: [std-proposals] Separately qualifying names in structured bindings"
• Previous message: Kyle Knoepfel: "[std-proposals] Separately qualifying names in structured bindings"
• In reply to: Andrew Tomazos: "Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Associated Methods (Draft 2)"

Thanks for the feedback. I have added an abstract.

On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 2:52 AM Andrew Tomazos <andrewtomazos_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> This paper lacks an introduction / abstract / background. Please
> summarize in one paragraph the content of the paper and place it at the top
> of the paper.
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 5:22 AM Михаил Найденов via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Happy New Year!
>> I present you a draft for "Associated Methods". The proposal aims to
>> allow free functions to be callable as members, without introducing any of
>> the problems of UFCS.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Std-Proposals mailing list
>> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
>> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>>
>

• text/html attachment: attachment

• text/html attachment: AssocMethods.html

• Next message: Ville Voutilainen: "Re: [std-proposals] Separately qualifying names in structured bindings"
• Previous message: Kyle Knoepfel: "[std-proposals] Separately qualifying names in structured bindings"
• In reply to: Andrew Tomazos: "Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Associated Methods (Draft 2)"

STD-PROPOSALS list run by std-proposals-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups