C++ Logo

STD-PROPOSALS

Advanced search

Subject: Re: [std-proposals] Template qualifiers
From: Phil Bouchard (phil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-06 14:12:57


If we can work together then I'd be willing to contribute. I know part
of Clang so I can potentially write a theoretical parser; maybe it's
easier than we think.

C++ is getting more and more complex and now's the time to simply its
core IMO...

On 11/6/19 3:00 PM, Brian Bi wrote:
> I spoke with Gašper Ažman, author of the "deducing this" proposal and
> he said that he considered the alternative approach (i.e., having
> cv-qualifiers be separately deducible) but he thinks it would be a
> multi-year effort to work out all the new template deduction rules. He
> also had some other idea called "computed deduction" that he claims
> would take care of some other cases like the std::is_function example
> I mentioned previously. I still think it would be nice to have
> deducible cv-qualifiers in the language, but I don't think I can
> commit the time to making the proposal.
>
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:18 PM Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:std-proposals_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> Any decision made regarding what was previously discussed?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
>
> *Phil Bouchard*
> Founder
> C.: (819) 328-4743
>
> Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden] <mailto:Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]>
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>
>
>
> --
> /Brian Bi/

-- 
*Phil Bouchard*
Founder
C.: (819) 328-4743
Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>


STD-PROPOSALS list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com

Standard Proposals Archives on Google Groups