On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 1:44 PM Ville Voutilainen <
ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 20:39, Hyman Rosen <hyrosen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > We should revert C++ to using the C Standard definition of object
> lifetime [6.2.4/2]:
> > "The lifetime of an object is the portion of program execution during
> which storage is guaranteed to be reserved for it."
> That works great for a language where every type is trivial. C is such a
> language, C++ is not.
>

What about it doesn't work for C++?