On Sunday 10 November 2024 21:02:25 Pacific Standard Time Phil Bouchard via
Std-Discussion wrote:
> This mailing list is not "proposals" but general discussions and
> sometimes we need to step back because on another note some government
> agencies might dismiss non-memory safe languages also:
> https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/16/safe_c_plusplus/

Not exactly. This is about discussions about the standard (current or maybe
upcoming). Can you relate your thoughts about power with the C++ Standard? Is
it a property of the language or the Standard Library that it will consume
less power (or more)? Is it a design goal that supposed to be a goal of the
standard language and library authors to think about power and performance? Or
should the standard only worry about performacne, leaving the power aspect
QoI?

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
  Principal Engineer - Intel DCAI Platform & System Engineering