This does look like an ad disguised as a discussion.

There's nothing in this email chain that is actionable.

The entire conversation can be dismissed with the simple question:
So what?

Doing stuff in Python takes longer to run and consumes more power than they otherwise would in C++.
So what?

I already knew that, and I assume everyone in this mailing list knows that.
What would you expect would be the outcome of such an exchange on this mailing list?
What do you intend to do?
Convince python developers (in a C++ mailing list) to switch to C++?

What would be the expect outcome where you would say, "yes, something was achieved here",
Other than plug for your own business?


On 11/10/24 22:19, Yongwei Wu wrote:
>
>
> For one thing, posting content whose format makes sense (partially)
> only when pasted to a Markdown editor is probably not a good idea. My
> eyes are not a good Markdown renderer. This also strengthens people's
> impression that the content is not human-generated and not worth reading.
>
> Even if the content is satisfactory, making the format easier to read
> makes the discussion easier to happen.
>
> And the important thing is how the content is relevant to C++
> standardization, which is what this mailing list is for.

This mailing list is not "proposals" but general discussions and sometimes we need to step back because on another note some government agencies might dismiss non-memory safe languages also:
https://www.theregister.com/2024/09/16/safe_c_plusplus/

So:
- Power consumption (on the good track) and;
- The lifetime of non-memory safe languages (can be addressed);

Are 2 very important topics that'll need to be understood one day or another.