On 09/02/2024 17.10, Brian Bi via Std-Discussion wrote:
> It's this thread: https://github.com/cplusplus/CWG/issues/486 <https://github.com/cplusplus/CWG/issues/486>
>
> It hasn't been turned into an actual core issue yet.

Now it has:

https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2856.html

Jens


> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:09 AM Daniel Krügler via Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden] <mailto:std-discussion_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> Am Fr., 9. Feb. 2024 um 15:53 Uhr schrieb Johannes Schaub via
> Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden] <mailto:std-discussion_at_[hidden]>>:
> >
> > Turns out that we have an issue report for this on WG21. It is public with github CWG issue 486.
>
> Can you please double-check the issue number? CWG 486 doesn't seem to
> make any sense, see
>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/cwg_defects.html#486 <https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/cwg_defects.html#486>
>
> (I also checked 468, but that doesn't fit either)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Daniel
> --
> Std-Discussion mailing list
> Std-Discussion_at_[hidden] <mailto:Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]>
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion <https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion>
>
>
>
> --
> /Brian Bi/
>