Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 11:10:48 -0500
It's this thread: https://github.com/cplusplus/CWG/issues/486
It hasn't been turned into an actual core issue yet.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:09 AM Daniel Krügler via Std-Discussion <
std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Am Fr., 9. Feb. 2024 um 15:53 Uhr schrieb Johannes Schaub via
> Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]>:
> >
> > Turns out that we have an issue report for this on WG21. It is public
> with github CWG issue 486.
>
> Can you please double-check the issue number? CWG 486 doesn't seem to
> make any sense, see
>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/cwg_defects.html#486
>
> (I also checked 468, but that doesn't fit either)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Daniel
> --
> Std-Discussion mailing list
> Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
>
It hasn't been turned into an actual core issue yet.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:09 AM Daniel Krügler via Std-Discussion <
std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Am Fr., 9. Feb. 2024 um 15:53 Uhr schrieb Johannes Schaub via
> Std-Discussion <std-discussion_at_[hidden]>:
> >
> > Turns out that we have an issue report for this on WG21. It is public
> with github CWG issue 486.
>
> Can you please double-check the issue number? CWG 486 doesn't seem to
> make any sense, see
>
> https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/cwg_defects.html#486
>
> (I also checked 468, but that doesn't fit either)
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Daniel
> --
> Std-Discussion mailing list
> Std-Discussion_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-discussion
>
-- *Brian Bi*
Received on 2024-02-09 16:11:02