ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Barry Revzin

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 17:59:41)

Bo Persson

Unexpected constraints on adjacent_transform_view::base() (2023-06-16 19:07:03)

Brian Bi

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-22 01:29:14)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-20 00:46:17)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 23:41:35)
Re: Type requirements for va_start (2023-06-06 01:35:27)

Daniel Krügler

Re: Unexpected constraints on adjacent_transform_view::base() (2023-06-16 19:31:31)
Re: add_rvalue_reference (2023-06-03 11:28:29)

David Brown

Re: pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-07 14:45:14)
Re: pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-06 09:40:52)

Federico Kircheis

Re: pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-06 05:02:45)
Re: pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-05 19:42:12)
pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-05 17:43:03)

Janet Cobb

Re: Type requirements for va_start (2023-06-08 19:49:21)

Jens Maurer

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-20 06:27:31)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 19:27:55)

language.lawyer_at

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-20 07:50:13)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 21:33:05)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 19:48:02)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 19:37:32)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-18 23:07:33)
Re: add_rvalue_reference (2023-06-03 11:26:37)

Lukas Barth

Re: Type requirements for va_start (2023-06-08 20:37:41)

Lénárd Szolnoki

Re: Separate headers for declaration and constexpr definition of the same function (2023-06-03 09:02:49)
Separate headers for declaration and constexpr definition of the same function (2023-06-02 08:24:11)

M.P.

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 20:28:58)
UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-18 21:49:46)

Marcin Jaczewski

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 17:56:17)

Matthew House

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-22 17:09:59)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-20 15:58:33)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-20 02:11:24)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-20 00:04:32)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 21:18:43)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 19:42:13)
Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 19:02:29)

Myria

Re: UB in P2641 'Checking if a union alternative is active' (2023-06-19 17:43:57)

Thiago Macieira

Re: pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-06 19:40:10)
Re: pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-05 22:41:45)
Re: Separate headers for declaration and constexpr definition of the same function (2023-06-02 20:33:06)

Tom Honermann

Re: pointer to volatile, but no volatile object (2023-06-05 19:05:51)

Vladimir Grigoriev

Re: add_rvalue_reference (2023-06-03 19:11:27)
add_rvalue_reference (2023-06-03 11:23:40)

Last message date: 2023-06-22 17:09:59