On 7/28/21 5:46 PM, Jason McKesson via Std-Discussion wrote:

> The problem as you have outlined it comes from move-*assignment*, not
> move-construction. And move assignment already uses that wording
> (though it should have a carveout for self-move-assignment).
>
> There is no defect here, just some poor implementations.

Thanks. I will instead report the issue to the library implementors.