Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 17:10:21 +0300
On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 at 17:06, Dmitry Dmitry via Std-Discussion
<std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's a bad joke, yes. The committee approved some bug fixes to Ranges
>> and std::format, and the committee is making
>> a recommendation for implementation vendors not to ship a
>> C++20-by-the-letter versions of some facilities, but
>> instead ship the fixed ones, which are incompatible in certain ways.
>
>
> Sorry, just out of curiosity, how is the above NOT an approval of C++20? What it is then?
C++20 is a published standard, its approval happened ages ago. The
above is work on top of it.
<std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It's a bad joke, yes. The committee approved some bug fixes to Ranges
>> and std::format, and the committee is making
>> a recommendation for implementation vendors not to ship a
>> C++20-by-the-letter versions of some facilities, but
>> instead ship the fixed ones, which are incompatible in certain ways.
>
>
> Sorry, just out of curiosity, how is the above NOT an approval of C++20? What it is then?
C++20 is a published standard, its approval happened ages ago. The
above is work on top of it.
Received on 2021-06-09 09:10:35