Subject: Re: QOL: trailing comma in template arguments
From: Jefferson Carpenter (jeffersoncarpenter2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2021-01-26 04:56:48
On 1/26/2021 9:25 AM, Ville Voutilainen via Std-Discussion wrote:
> The usual feedback bit is to bring us a comprehensive package that
> looks at all of the cases where
> trailing commas should be allowed, not just a single tweak for one
> case where there's a comma-separated list.
It does seem to be not the most trivial change, since
template-argument-list is non-empty so the parser can just parse a
template-argument after the "<", and again after each ",".
STD-DISCUSSION list run by firstname.lastname@example.org
Older Archives on Google Groups