On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 15:45, Ville Voutilainen
<ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 15:27, Peter C++ via Std-Discussion
> <std-discussion_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Just to make my statement:
> >
> > Those functions use their return value to do error reporting. I would be shocked about a design that additionally would throw exceptions.
> >
> > And they pretend to be low level.
> >
> > Should I file a library issue to make them noexcept. Or is that too much of Design that lewg needs to be involved?
>
> There is no library issue here to report. These functions as specified
> are consistent with the noexcept guidelines.
> If you wish to change them to be guaranteed to be noexcept and thus
> prevent implementations that wish
> to throw out of them in some debug mode, LEWG is your huckleberry. The
> three implementations of these
> functions that I can see already make them noexcept anyway.

The LWG chair (who is not sub'd to the list) says there is no library
issue, please don't file an issue.